Vendor Teardown 01 — Floor Plan

Source: 01_floorplan.pdf Customer: Association 3 (Maltese cannabis association) Vendor: Green Jungle Offer: 07_pricing_offer.pdf dated 12.03.2026, equipment spec dated 24.03.2026

Read

Dimensions on the plan are in centimetres. Building is a long, narrow rectangle: internal length 1680 cm (16.80 m), corridor ~160 cm wide along the bottom. Total envelope ≈ 16.8 m × ~10 m = ~168 m². Two electric switchboards are marked in blue:

1. Mid-building on the south wall, sandwiched between the two large rooms. Makes sense — shortest cable runs to the highest lighting loads in the flowering rooms.
2. East entry, near the utility side of the building.

Rooms mentioned in the pricing offer

The pricing offer (07_pricing_offer.pdf) references these rooms — some of which are not in the equipment spec tables:

• Flowering 1 and Flowering 2 — the two large rooms
• Mothers room
• Vegetative room
• Dry room
• Wet room (irrigation / RO / dosing skid)
• Flower store — NEW, gets a single split AC (€750), not in equipment spec
• Corridor — NEW, gets 2 split ACs (€1 500), not in equipment spec
• Cloning room — not explicitly in the pricing (the clone lamps are billed under "Vegetative room" on the pricing offer, even though the equipment spec separates them)

The Flower store is presumably the dried-flower holding room (cool-dark-sealed between dry and final pack). The Corridor getting 2× AC hints at a long enough central run that single-point cooling is insufficient — consistent with the 16.8 m building length.

Room-to-equipment inference

The vendor did not annotate the plan with room roles. Best-fit mapping of the drawn cells to the equipment tables:

Total accounted ≈ 151 m² of rooms + corridor + closets — checks out against the ~168 m² envelope.

Findings

Gap 1 — No mechanical room

Nothing on the plan reserves space for:

• 2× ducted flowering-HVAC condensers (or, in the DIY case, 12× split condensers)
• Dehumidifier heat rejection
• Dosing skid (if separate from the wet room)
• Backup genset
• Main electrical panel beyond the two small switchboards drawn

On a single-storey flat-roof building the roof is the obvious spot for condensers and condensate drain runs, but nothing is drawn. This is where the build usually goes wrong.

Gap 2 — Flowering room depth is tight

4.53 m room depth for tables at 4.5 m length is just adequate. Tables must be oriented lengthways along the 5.30 m wall — if the installer orients them the other way, the tables don't fit. Confirm orientation with vendor before sign-off.

With 3 tables × 1.2 m across 5.30 m: 3 × 1.2 = 3.6 m of table width, leaving 1.7 m total aisle space split across 4 aisle positions → ~42 cm per aisle. Tight but workable. With the 4.53 m long direction and 4.5 m tables: only 3 cm clearance to the wall at each end. Meaning tables physically cannot be full-length — either vendor specced the wrong size or the plan is wrong.

Gap 3 — No room labelling on the plan

The customer will spend the first site visit asking the vendor "which room is which?". This is a documentation hygiene failure and should be the first thing we fix in any counter-proposal walkthrough.

Gap 4 — Switchboard capacity unspecified

The two blue boxes are drawn but their feeder size, bus rating, and breaker schedule are not in any of the 6 documents. At ~51 kW peak facility load (see 09_electrical.md), those panels need to be sized for 80–100 A three-phase.

Confirmations still needed from vendor

1. Room-label each cell on a revised plan.
2. Show where the mechanical / condenser equipment lives.
3. Confirm table orientation in the flowering rooms.
4. Provide switchboard schedules (busbar A, breaker list, feeder cable size).
5. Confirm incoming service amperage from landlord / EPD.